The civil responsibility of the government and the sovereign in crimes that are committed against physical integrity, in Islamic jurisprudence and law, has a history as long as the establishment of the first Islamic government. The responsibility of the Islamic government to pay the death penalty in certain cases, such as when people are killed due to crowding, is a matter of consensus and is accepted among jurists, but there is a difference of opinion among Islamic jurists and jurists regarding the government's responsibility to pay the death penalty for injuries less than life. Is.A group of jurists, considering the principle of personal responsibility and the violation of the principle of payment of money by a person other than the perpetrator, as well as the need to be careful in spending Bait-ul-Mal with the claim that there is no valid reason to deviate from these principles, have excluded the responsibility of Bait-ul-Mal. In this article, by referring to numerous traditions, this idea has been strengthened that in any case where Baitul-Mal is responsible for the self, it will also be responsible for injuries less than the self. Key words: civil responsibility of the government, responsible for paying dowry, death dowry, injury dowry, non-cancellable rule
