After the Iranian Islamic revolution, the idea of "Islamic human rights" was discussed as a competing theory due to theories and thoughts about "universal human rights". Therefore, a wide range of supportive and skeptical opinions has been theorized about that idea based on political, cultural and legal perspectives. This article seeks to answer this question: "How can these views be recognized in a logical and coherent format and examined from a theoretical perspective and current studies?" in the light of qualitative and descriptive method. It seems that using logical thoughts, which is agreed upon by domestic and foreign thinkers, makes it possible to achieve this classification. In order to achieve this goal, foremost, the discussions about the subject and the nature of Islamic human rights have been divided into two general groups: refusal and the possibility of these rights; Then, examples of the topics raised in the refusal group, according to the current studies, have been presented; At the end, an example of topics that can be proposed in each of the two levels for the possibility of Islamic human rights has been discussed.