1
Department of Islamic Education and Law of Al-Mustafa Al-Alamiya Society, Golestan representative
2
Assistant Professor of Law Department, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
In the Iranian legal system, based on the principle of privacy and general rules of responsibility, the principle is that online platforms are not responsible for the actions of their users. Obviously, all instances of loss due to the actions of users through platforms are subject to the rule of liability on the premise of the community of steward and cause, and the application of this rule imposes responsibility on the steward (user) unless the cause (platform) is strong. The criterion of an optimal legal system in the field of civil liability of platforms is the criterion that strikes a balance between the two interests of freedom of expression and the restriction of illegitimate content on online platforms. In Iran, obliging platform managers to review and select content for uploading will reduce content production due to managers escaping criminal liability risk. Also, in some cases, recognizing the legitimacy or illegitimacy of some instances of users' actions is complicated. Therefore, in cases of civil liability, by developing the concept of robustness of cause, where the platform intentionally commits a serious offense, it should be held accountable, and in the case of criminal liability, such liability should be exercised if the platform is malicious.
Duggan, M.; Online Harassment; Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2017.
Evans, D., Hagiu, A. and Schmalensee, R. Invisible Engines; How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries; MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2006.
Geschke, D. , Klaßen, A., Quent, M. and Richter, C. Hass im Netz: Der schleichende Angriff auf unsere Demokratie. Eine bundesweite repräsentative Untersuchung; Jena, Germany: Institut für Demokratie und Zivilgesellschaft, 2019.
An Introduction to Online Platforms and Their Role in the Digital Transformation; OECD, Publishing, Paris, 2019.
Rochet, J. and Tirole, J. Two-sided markets; "A progress report The Rand", Journal of Economics;35, no.3, 2006.
Rochet, J. and Tirole, J.; "Platform competition in two-sided markets", Journal of the European Economic Association;1, no.4, 2003.
Sevanian, M.; "Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act: A 'Good Samaritan' Law Without the Requirement of Acting as a 'Good Samaritan'", UCLA Entertainment Law Review;21, no.1, 2014.