Although Ehsan rule flow in jurisprudence has been considered as one of the responsible ؛ But the basis for Mohsen's loss of responsibility lies not in the appearance of the rule, but in the nature and content of it, and is dependent on the substantive or substantive principles of responsibility. Whereas the relation of citation in its general sense, which includes the relation of causality and causation, is responsible for the loss or damage. Comprehensively considered and related to other rules of warranty, it will be important to explain the relationship of the rule with it. Since the introduction of the flow of citation relationship in the subject of the determinant of the agent, the potential loss of the active verb means the ability and the potential for unseemly and pernicious harm in his act. Therefore, it is necessary to acknowledge the existence of a meaningful link between the verb with the potential for loss and the flow of the citation relationship with the Ehsan rule. Ehsan's rule can only have an effect when a prima facie relationship is established and available. In fact, the validity of the citation relation as a proof of guarantee is the principle prior to the flow of Ehsan's rule as a voider and, in other words, the flow of Ehsan's rule is subordinate to the validity of the citation. Therefore, the Ehsan rule, not the upper bound, but the intermediary and after the citation relationship, causes the responsibility to fall.
