Although numerous scholarly scholars have been referred to the jurisprudents as the proof of this rule. But without a doubt, the good and evil way of preventing it, and thus preventing harm, is from the precepts that reason, regardless of the legal texts, or the adjective, is ruled by it, and is from the doctrine of reason. Since the foundation of the Qur'anic reasons is the validity and consensus of the dismissive principle of returning due to rational reasoning, it seems that explaining this reason is of great importance. The significance of this explanation is in such a way that it can be used as a yardstick for judging various views about the content of this rule. So the most important question about this rule is how can we explain the rational cause for it? This paper seeks to explain the rational reason based on the anthropology of the Holy Qur'an, which was actually raised in a philosophical context. Given this explanation, a new perspective on the meaning of the rule can be raised. The present study uses a descriptive-analytic method to investigate the basics of anthropology of the unpardonable and lazy principle.
