Comparative study of Iranian companies in Iranian law with civil companies in French law

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Kashan University, iran

Abstract

Comparative comparison between proportional partnership of Iran law and civil partnership of France law represents that "partnership concept", "general rules of partnership law" and "civil partnership" aren’t in civil code. The regulations of partnership of commercial law need to be reviewed. So, the legislator must create these concepts and review or organize them.  Comparative Study of the regulations about the partnership of Iran civil code helps considerably to derive and solve the problems. These regulations define diffusion and express it as state of partnership. The regulations of article 571of civil code are sufficiently illustrative in this aspect. The elements of definition used in it are as follows: subject unity, the unity of applied right and plurality of owner. In this research, by focusing the elements of partnership namely the intention of being partner, the intention of taking profit and capital stock, we create partnership concept and then we found civil partnership based on its bases. Also, by focusing the security of third party, we suggest general rules for partnership law in civil code and some reforms in commercial law. So, it is possible to allocate the traditional rules of contract law by focusing such party.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1.  

    1. اسکینی، ربیعا؛ حقوق تجارت: شرکت‌های تجاری؛ ج1، چ11، تهران: سمت، 1386.
    2. پاسبان، محمدرضا؛ حقوق شرکت‎های تجاری؛ تهران: سمت، 1395.
    3. ستوده‌تهرانی، حسن؛ حقوق تجارت؛ ج1، تهران: دادگستر، 1382.
    4. سیدی آرانی، سیدعباس؛ «اختلاط بین مفهوم اشاعه و شرکت در قانون مدنی ایران»؛ تحقیقات حقوقی، ش66، 1392.
    5. عرفانی، محمود؛ حقوق تجارت؛ ج4، تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی، 1373.
    6. کاتوزیان، ناصر؛ حقوق مدنی: عقود معین، مشارکت‎ها، صلح؛ ج2، تهران: گنج دانش، 1386.
    7. کاتوزیان، ناصر؛ حقوق مدنی: مشارکت‎ها، صلح، عطایا؛ تهران: گنج دانش، 1373.
    8. کاشانی، سید‌محمود؛ قراردادهای ویژه؛ چ1، تهران: میزان، 1388.
      1. Cass. 1er civ., 18 juillet 1995, n° 93- 19449, Bull. civ. I, n° 320.
      2. Cass. 1er civ., 20 janvier 2010, n° 08-13200, Bull. civ. I, n° 11 Catala (P.), "L’indivision", Defrénois 1979, art. 31874.
      3. CE, 13 mars 1998, RDF 1998, n° 26, comm. 588, concl. F. Loloum, obs. F. Deboissy.
      4. Corlay, P.; "La protection des tiers dans le nouveau droit commun des sociétés civiles"; RTD, 1981.
      5. Cozian, M., A. Viandier and F. Deboissy; Droit Des Sociétés; 25e édition, Paris: LexisNexis, 2012.
      6. Deboissy, F. and G. Wicker; "La distinction de l’indivision et de la société et ses enjeux fiscaux"; RTD, 2000.
      7. Lamboley, A.; "Sociétés civiles professionnelles. Relations internes et relations externes"; J-Cl Sociétés traité, Fasc. 191-11, 2007.
      8. Lefebvre, F.; Mémento Pratique Sociétés civiles; Paris: Levallois-Perret: F. Lefebvre, 2011-2012.
      9. Guillien, R., J. Vincent, S. Guinchard et G. Montagnier; Lexique des termes juridiques; 16e édition, Paris: Dalloz, 2007.
      10. Maury, F.; L’exercice, sous la forme d’une société, d’une profession libérale règlementée; Aix-en-Provence: Presses universitaires d’Aix-Marseille, 2000.
      11. Maury, F.; Sociétés civiles professionnelles; Rép. Sociétés Dalloz, 2009.
      12. Cannu, P. Le et B. Dondero; Droit des sociétés; 4e édition, Paris: Lextenso, 2012.
      13. Paillusseau, J.; "Le droit moderne de la personnalité morale"; RTD: Revue trimestrielle de droit civil, Dalloz, 1993.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics