In addition to the courts dealing with the disputes of the parties to the dispute, the institution of arbitration is considered a specialized, fast and increasingly popular method due to the respect for the sovereignty of the will of the parties to the dispute in determining the arbitrator and choosing the procedure. In the discussion of the effects of arbitration, although the judgment issued in arbitration is generally effective for the parties present in the arbitration, the question is whether it is possible to review the judgment issued by other arbitrators and judges or not? If this is possible, on what basis and in what cases is it possible to review the issued decision? In this article, while examining and criticizing the supporting evidence of the rule "the sanctity of violating the ruling of a mujtahid judge", while proving the lack of ijtihad in the position of issuing a decision and the lack of difference between the decision of the appointed judge and the decision of the arbitrator (judge of consolidation) due to the revision of Manat, the theory of revision and the possibility of revision The decision issued by the arbitrator (just like the judge's decision) is accepted due to the evidence of the influence of the judge's ruling and the inclusion of this evidence in the second judgment, but the possibility of review and appeal is limited to the absence of chaos and is limited to cases that lead to invalidity or The lack of credibility of judicial opinions and arbitration and the weakening of the ruling body should not prevail. Many times, the possibility of revision of executive methods lacks Sharia ruling, which at different times according to the different circumstances that exist, the sovereignty of the Islamic country determines its limits and territory
هاشمی شاهرودی، محمود؛ فرهنگ فقه مطابق مذهب اهل بیت؛ قم: مؤسسه دائرةالمعارف اسلامی، 1387.
هوشمند فیروزآبادی، حسین؛ «مشروعیت و ماهیت داوری در قرآن کریم»، مجله قرآن، فقه و حقوق اسلامی؛ ش16، بهار و تابستان 1401، ص81ـ110.
هوشمند فیروزآبادی، حسین؛ «مطالعه تطبیقی ماهیت داوری در حقوق غرب، فقه امامیه و حقوق ایران»، مجله پژوهشهای تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب (دانشگاه قم)؛ ش34، زمستان 1401، ص331ـ372.
یزدی، سیدمحمدکاظم؛ العروةالوثقى مع تعلیقات السیدمصطفى الخمینی؛ تهران: مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینى، 1418ق.
Nigel Blackaby Constantine Partasides Alan Redfern Martin Hunter, Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 6th ed, 2015.
houshmand,H. , salimzadeh,H. , ehsanifar,A. and Mobayen,H. (2025). The possibility of reviewing and revising arbitration decisions. Islamic Law, 22(86), 35-74. doi: 10.22034/ilaw.2025.711381
MLA
houshmand,H. , , salimzadeh,H. , , ehsanifar,A. , and Mobayen,H. . "The possibility of reviewing and revising arbitration decisions", Islamic Law, 22, 86, 2025, 35-74. doi: 10.22034/ilaw.2025.711381
HARVARD
houshmand H., salimzadeh H., ehsanifar A., Mobayen H. (2025). 'The possibility of reviewing and revising arbitration decisions', Islamic Law, 22(86), pp. 35-74. doi: 10.22034/ilaw.2025.711381
CHICAGO
H. houshmand, H. salimzadeh, A. ehsanifar and H. Mobayen, "The possibility of reviewing and revising arbitration decisions," Islamic Law, 22 86 (2025): 35-74, doi: 10.22034/ilaw.2025.711381
VANCOUVER
houshmand H., salimzadeh H., ehsanifar A., Mobayen H. The possibility of reviewing and revising arbitration decisions. Islamic Law, 2025; 22(86): 35-74. doi: 10.22034/ilaw.2025.711381
